Interior Design Protection Consulting

October 14, 2013

Update on California CID Program



On September 9th, SB 308 was signed into law by Governor Brown (D).  The bill will extend California’s private certification program for four more years.

As you may recall, California is the only state certification program that IDPC supports because:

  1. It has a private board, not a state board;
  2. It is self-sufficient and receives no state/taxpayer funding;
  3. It is inclusive and allows anyone who wants to become certified to take the IDEX (which tests CA state codes) as a qualifier
  4. It does not impose the NCIDQ upon the design community as a qualifier

During the sunset process, ASID via their funded coalition, IDCC, tried to get the NCIDQ placed into the California CID program.  I worked very hard on behalf of IDPC’s clients to make sure that the NCIDQ STAYED OUT!  I spent quite a bit of time throughout the year traveling around California lobbying legislators, testifying at hearings, meeting with the Committee consultant, and educating the design community as to why it would be inexpedient to include the NCIDQ in the program and create a new, unfair, and unmerited level of design over the current CID’s and non-CID’s.

I am happy to report that with the help of the NKBA, IDPC was successful in our efforts and the NCIDQ continues to be kept out of California certification.

IDPC and NKBA also worked (and were successful) in removing ASID/IDCC’s proposed change to Section 5805(b) to the Business and Professions Code because it would have created confusion as to the right of non-Certified Interior Designers to submit plans to local building departments.

The bill also requires that CID’s use written contracts – none of the stakeholder groups objected to that insertion; the bill also requires that CCIDC conduct their board meetings in conjunction with the Bagley-Keen Act (transparency) which they’ve been doing all along so this just made it “official.”

We know that ASID does not like the current certification program in California because CCIDC will not accept the anti-competitive and irrelevant NCIDQ; we defeated ASID/IDCC’s latest of several efforts to impose full-blown occupational licensing in 2012 and we’re sure they will try again in the future.

And we’ll be right there to beat them back again, and protect the rights of the design community.


  1. Congratulations to Patti – keep up the good work!

    Comment by Architect — October 14, 2013 @ 9:23 pm |Reply

  2. WAY TO GO!!!

    Comment by Laura Varley — October 15, 2013 @ 2:25 pm |Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: